Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is way better than Motorola razr (2019)'s global score of 75.2. Despite being the best phone we compare here, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is a little bit heavier and thicker than the Motorola razr (2019). Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version while Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better display than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a much higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a greater count of pixels per inch of display and a little bit larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot better camera than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way higher video definition and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much longer battery life than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.