Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-02-06 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | -- |
| 373 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than the Motorola razr (2019), with an 80.1 score against 75.2. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10, providing you some nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's body is extremely thicker and heavier than Motorola razr (2019).
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better performance than Motorola razr (2019), although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a more vivid display than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a way higher quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola razr (2019) and the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro feature really similar cameras, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much worse (Full HD) video quality and a back-facing camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 79 percent larger battery capacity.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.