Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than Motorola razr (2020)'s 87 general score. The iPhone X is an a lot older phone than the Motorola razr (2020), but it is a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. The Apple iPhone X has a little better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has lesser RAM and less and slower CPU cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The iPhone X has a more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a bit better display density. Motorola razr (2020) has a much better camera than iPhone X, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back facing camera with much more MP and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Apple iPhone X has as much memory capacity to store more apps and games as the Motorola razr (2020) one, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory. The Motorola razr (2020) has just a bit better battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has 2800mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the iPhone X is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.