Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is just a bit better than iPhone XS, with an 87 score against 84.2. Even though Motorola razr (2020) is noticeably newer than iPhone XS, it is a little heavier and just a little bit thicker. Apple iPhone XS has a much better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a better 1125 x 2436 resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Apple iPhone XS features a bit superior processor than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has less RAM and 2 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 2800mAh battery capacity instead of 2659mAh. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a superior camera than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light captures, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos and a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than the iPhone XS, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the iPhone XS. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the iPhone XS, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.