Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 2's score of 81.6. Motorola razr (2020)'s design has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 2, but it's a lot heavier. Motorola razr (2020) has a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 features a little bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a little bit better pixels density. The Motorola razr (2020) has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because it has more internal memory.
The Motorola razr (2020) shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a bigger aperture for better images in poorly lited environments, a way larger camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality and a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
Motorola razr (2020) features just a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has 2800mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 2. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 2, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.