Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 2 XL's 82.5 score. The Motorola razr (2020) is a a little heavier device than the Google Pixel 2 XL, but both of them have the same thickness. The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a greater screen pixel density. The Motorola razr (2020) has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Google Pixel 2 XL counts with longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 26% bigger battery size. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a bigger aperture, a camera in the back with lot more MP and a much bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 2 XL. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 2 XL, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.