Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is slightly better than Google Pixel 3, with a general score of 87 against 80. The Motorola razr (2020) is a much heavier cellphone than Google Pixel 3, but both are 0.31inches thick. Motorola razr (2020) counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2160 resolution and a just a little greater pixels density. Motorola razr (2020) features a superior camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality, a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and a way higher resolution camera.
Motorola razr (2020) features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 3 features a bit longer battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 2915mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 3, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.