Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3 XL's overall score of 80.7. The Motorola razr (2020) design has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 3 XL, but it is a little bit heavier. Google Pixel 3 XL features a brighter display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a better screen density, a quite larger screen and a way higher 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory.
Motorola razr (2020) takes much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a larger aperture for better low light captures and video.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3430mAh battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3 XL. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3 XL, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.