Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-02 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than the Google Pixel 3a, getting a general score of 87 against 78.8. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS. Although the Motorola razr (2020) is much heavier than the Google Pixel 3a, it's a little thinner and also newer. The Google Pixel 3a features a little bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2220 resolution and a little bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory. Motorola razr (2020) has much more storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 192 GB more internal memory.
The Google Pixel 3a features just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. The Motorola razr (2020) captures much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot more MP camera, a bigger aperture and a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Google Pixel 3a, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.