Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 4 XL's 82.9 general score. The Motorola razr (2020) design is newer, a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than Google Pixel 4 XL. Google Pixel 4 XL features a much better display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3040, a little bit bigger screen and a better pixels density.
Google Pixel 4 XL has just a little better performance than Motorola razr (2020), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola razr (2020) has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Motorola razr (2020) takes much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same video quality and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot more MP back facing camera.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with improved battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 32 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 4 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 4 XL. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 4 XL, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.