Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is slightly better than Google Pixel 4a, having a overall score of 87 against 82.9. Although the Motorola razr (2020) and Google Pixel 4a were released with only 1 months difference, Motorola razr (2020)'s body is a little bit thinner but also heavier. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both should provide you all the same OS features.
Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better processor than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 2 GB more RAM. The Google Pixel 4a features a little sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bit higher screen density.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 4a features a bit superior battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3140mAh battery size.
Motorola razr (2020) captures much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same video resolution, a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much higher resolution back camera and a lot larger camera sensor.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 4a. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Google Pixel 4a, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.