Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 373 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is much better than the HTC U Ultra's score of 77. Motorola razr (2020)'s design has the same thickness than HTC U Ultra, but it is heavier. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with just a bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
HTC U Ultra counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. The HTC U Ultra counts with a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola razr (2020) features a much better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way higher resolution camera, a larger aperture to take better captures in low light situations and a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 7% bigger battery size.
The Motorola razr (2020) costs a lot more than the HTC U Ultra, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.