Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-10-02 | 2016-03-31 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is better than LG G5, getting a general score of 87 against 76.1. Motorola razr (2020)'s construction is extremely newer, but somewhat heavier and just a little thicker than LG G5. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola razr (2020) has the previous 11 version while LG G5 has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Motorola razr (2020) features just a bit better performance than LG G5, because it has more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG G5 has a sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better count of pixels per inch of screen.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a little bit better storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG G5, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The LG G5's battery duration is just as good as the battery lifetime in Motorola razr (2020).
The Motorola razr (2020) captures better pictures and videos than LG G5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way bigger sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality, a larger aperture and a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG G5, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G5. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), otherwise you can save some dollars and get the LG G5, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.