Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Sky Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than the LG K62, having an 87 score against 78.2. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola razr (2020) has newer 11 version while LG K62 has Android 10. Motorola razr (2020)'s design is a bit heavier but just a little bit thinner than the LG K62, and they were only released with a couple months difference.
The Motorola razr (2020) features just a bit better processing power than LG K62, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit better display than LG K62, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel count per inch in the display and a better resolution of 876 x 2142.
LG K62 counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better camera than LG K62, and although they both have a back camera with a 48 mega-pixels and a same size camera sensor, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger aperture.
LG K62 has a superior battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 43 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.