Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is just a bit better than the LG K92's 85.4 general score. Motorola razr (2020)'s design is just a bit thinner and a little lighter than LG K92, even when both of them were only released with a couple of months difference. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version while LG K92 has Android 10 version.
Motorola razr (2020) has a bit faster processor than LG K92, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM. LG K92 features a bit better display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little greater display density, a bit bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The LG K92 features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K92 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing photos and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the LG K92 also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
The LG K92 has a very superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 43% bigger battery size.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG K92. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola razr (2020), but if you don't you can save some money and buy the LG K92, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.