Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2020-10-02 | 2017-07-21 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.87 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.15 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than the LG Q8, with an 87 score against 77.2. Motorola razr (2020)'s design has the same thickness than LG Q8, but it's heavier. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2020) has an older 11 version while LG Q8 has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a little faster processing unit than LG Q8, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores (and they are faster). The LG Q8 has a better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a much better pixel number per inch of display.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a slightly better memory to store more games and applications than LG Q8, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola razr (2020) shoots much better videos and photos than LG Q8, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a bigger aperture for better low light captures, a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a lot bigger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
LG Q8 has a bit superior battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 7 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.