Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Holographic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is better than LG Stylo 6, having an 87 score against 76.7. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Motorola razr (2020) has a newer 11 version and LG Stylo 6 has Android 10 version. Motorola razr (2020)'s design is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than LG Stylo 6, although both were released only 5 months apart.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit faster processing unit than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM. The LG Stylo 6 features a little sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a better 1080 x 2460 resolution, a little bigger screen and a just a little greater pixels count in each screen inch.
Motorola razr (2020) features a much better camera than LG Stylo 6, because it has a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a lot bigger sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a larger diafragm aperture to take better images in low light situations.
The LG Stylo 6 features a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG Stylo 6 features a way better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Stylo 6. If you want to save some money, you can get the LG Stylo 6, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.