Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is slightly better than the LG V35 ThinQ, with a score of 87 against 81.3. The Motorola razr (2020) design is notably newer than the LG V35 ThinQ's, but it is just a bit thicker and heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ has a better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a better pixels count in each inch of screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ has more storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ features a bit faster processor than Motorola razr (2020), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola razr (2020) captures much better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a way larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures and a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The LG V35 ThinQ has superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V35 ThinQ. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the LG V35 ThinQ, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.