Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a global score of 87.6, which is just a bit better than the Motorola razr (2020)'s 87 general score. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, LG V60 ThinQ's design is heavier and somewhat thicker than Motorola razr (2020). Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding OS features.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, a little bigger display and a little bit greater number of pixels in each inch in the display. LG V60 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola razr (2020). They have 8 CPU cores and a 8 GB RAM.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ features a very superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
The Motorola razr (2020) captures better photos and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and images, a camera in the back with a lot worse 48 mega pixels resolution and a much lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light images and videos.
The LG V60 ThinQ not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.