Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is a bit better than the Motorola razr (2020), with a general score of 87.1 against 87. The LG Velvet body has the same thickness than the Motorola razr (2020), but it's a little bit lighter. The LG Velvet has a little bit better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit higher count of pixels per inch in the screen, a bit bigger display and a better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit more powerful processor than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory. Motorola razr (2020) features a slightly better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, the same (4K) video resolution and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a bigger aperture.
LG Velvet has a very superior storage for applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet counts with a way better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 54% more battery capacity.
The LG Velvet not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.