Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-09-10 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 7.36 x 5.72 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 8.82 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Glacier |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8.1 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2700 x 1800 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 11.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3577mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is better than Microsoft Surface Duo's 78.8 overall score. Even though Motorola razr (2020) and the Microsoft Surface Duo were released with only a couple of months difference, the Motorola razr (2020) design is thicker but a lot lighter than the Microsoft Surface Duo. These phones work with Android operating system, but Motorola razr (2020) has the newer 11 version and Microsoft Surface Duo has Android 10 version.
The Microsoft Surface Duo has a bit sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit better screen pixels density, a much larger screen and a lot better resolution of 1800 x 2700. The Microsoft Surface Duo counts with just a little better performance than Motorola razr (2020), although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Motorola razr (2020) features much more storage to store more games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Microsoft Surface Duo counts with improved battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 28 percent more battery size. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a lot better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution camera and a larger aperture for better images and videos in low-light environments.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than Microsoft Surface Duo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Microsoft Surface Duo. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Microsoft Surface Duo, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.