Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is a little bit better than the Microsoft Surface Duo 2's 85.3 general score. Both of these devices use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect. Motorola razr (2020) is an older and thicker device than the Microsoft Surface Duo 2, but Motorola managed to make it a lot lighter anyway.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a much better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display, a way higher resolution of 1892 x 2688 and a much larger display. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola razr (2020). Both of them have 8 cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Motorola razr (2020) captures better photographs and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a way better battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 59% larger battery size.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Microsoft Surface Duo 2. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Microsoft Surface Duo 2, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.