Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, having an 87 score against 83.4. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola razr (2020) has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13. Even though the Motorola razr (2020) is much older than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, it's construction is just a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite higher pixels count in each inch in the display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite larger display. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with as much memory for applications, games, photos and videos as the Motorola razr (2020), they have the same internal storage capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a better camera than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a more MP back facing camera, a way higher video quality and a much larger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.