Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is a bit better than Motorola One Hyper, having a global score of 87 against 79.8. The Motorola razr (2020) is a newer device, and it is also thinner and a little lighter than Motorola One Hyper. Both phones in this comparison review include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should count with very similar operating system features.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better CPU than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Motorola One Hyper has a bit sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340, a little bit bigger display and a just a bit greater display density.
Motorola razr (2020) has a slightly better camera than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a back camera with lot less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low light photos and video. The Motorola One Hyper features more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper has a way better battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Hyper. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Motorola razr (2020), but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola One Hyper, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.