Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-09-23 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 8.01 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Polar night |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is just a bit better than Nokia 8.3 5G, getting an 87 score against 80.5. The Motorola razr (2020) design is lighter and somewhat thinner than Nokia 8.3 5G, although both of them were only released 0 months apart. Both devices we compare here work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding operating system features.
Nokia 8.3 5G features a processor that's just as good as the CPU in Motorola razr (2020), both have a 8 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores. Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a just a little greater screen density and a bit bigger screen.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a better camera than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a lower video quality and a back camera with much less mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture for better photography in low-light environments.
Nokia 8.3 5G features just a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Nokia 8.3 5G features a very superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Nokia 8.3 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Nokia 8.3 5G. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Nokia 8.3 5G, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.