Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Nokia 9 PureView, getting a global score of 87 against 76.4. Motorola razr (2020) is a heavier cellphone than the Nokia 9 PureView, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. The Nokia 9 PureView has a brighter display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola razr (2020), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3320mAh battery size. The Motorola razr (2020) shoots much better pictures and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution, a lot larger camera sensor and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and video.
The Motorola razr (2020) is a lot more expensive than the Nokia 9 PureView, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.