Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-02 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than nubia Red Magic 3S, getting an 87 score against 75.8. The Motorola razr (2020) is a newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Motorola razr (2020) has an older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features just a bit better performance than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit bigger screen, a little bit more pixels per inch in the display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit better camera than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back, a same size sensor and a F1.7 camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot better video resolution. The nubia Red Magic 3S has as much storage for apps and games as the Motorola razr (2020), they have the same 256 GB internal memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than nubia Red Magic 3S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the nubia Red Magic 3S. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the nubia Red Magic 3S, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.