Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is better than nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 general score. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola razr (2020) has the newer 11 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, providing you a couple nice extra features. Even when Motorola razr (2020) and nubia Red Magic 5S were released only 1 months apart, Motorola razr (2020) is thinner and lighter.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features just a bit better display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a just a bit higher pixels count in each screen inch, a bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit larger screen. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a little faster CPU than Motorola razr (2020). Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a superior battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit better camera than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels back camera, a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs and a lot better video resolution.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than the nubia Red Magic 5S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as nubia Red Magic 5S. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the nubia Red Magic 5S, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.