Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-12-03 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A13 5G's 82.1 score. The Motorola razr (2020) is an older device than Galaxy A13 5G, but it is somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter anyway. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version while Galaxy A13 5G has Android 12.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 876 x 2142 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. The Motorola razr (2020) has much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a little better processing power than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola razr (2020) captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a much better (4K) video quality and a larger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
Galaxy A13 5G features a very superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.