Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than the Galaxy A15 5G, getting a general score of 87 against 77.4. These devices have Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2020) has the older 11 version and Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14. The Motorola razr (2020) construction is just a little lighter and a little bit thinner than Galaxy A15 5G, although it was released 3 years before.
Motorola razr (2020) features a very superior performance than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A15 5G has a little bit better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite better number of pixels in each screen inch, a little bit bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A15 5G has a way better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a way better video quality.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A15 5G. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy A15 5G, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.