Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-02 | -- |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, getting an 87 score against 76.2. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola razr (2020) has the previous 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14. Motorola razr (2020)'s design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, but it is just a little lighter.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A16 5G features a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a just a little better pixels count in each display inch and a quite bigger display.
Galaxy A16 5G counts with more memory to store more apps and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola razr (2020) shoots way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a lesser mega pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with a very superior battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.