Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-06-29 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than the Galaxy A21, with a general score of 87 against 76.1. These phones come with Android OS, but Motorola razr (2020) has a more recent 11 version while Galaxy A21 has Android 10. The Motorola razr (2020) is a just a bit thinner and a bit lighter device than the Galaxy A21, even when they were released with only a couple of months difference.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A21, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM. Motorola razr (2020) features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A21, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels count per screen inch and a better resolution of 876 x 2142.
Motorola razr (2020) shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A21, because it has a much bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a bigger camera aperture for better low light photography and video, a camera with a way higher resolution and a much higher video resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A21, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A21 has a really longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 43% larger battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A21, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A21. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy A21, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.