Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 373 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G76 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Samsung Galaxy A21s, with an 87 score against 77.7. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola razr (2020) has a newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A21s has Android 10, providing some extra features. Motorola razr (2020) is a somewhat thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy A21s, but they weight the same.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A21s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 876 x 2142px. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A21s, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A21s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 5 GB more RAM. Motorola razr (2020) takes clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A21s, and although they both have a 0.5 inches back camera sensor and a back facing camera with a 48 MP resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot better (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy A21s has a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 79% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.