Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is slightly better than Galaxy A22 5G, having a overall score of 87 against 84.6. Although the Motorola razr (2020) and the Galaxy A22 5G were only released with a couple months difference, the Motorola razr (2020) is somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
Galaxy A22 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite better quantity of pixels in each inch in the display, a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit bigger display. The Motorola razr (2020) features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a slightly bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Motorola razr (2020) captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way better (4K) video resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a much longer battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.