Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is a bit better than the Galaxy A25 5G, with an 87 score against 79.9. The Motorola razr (2020) is an notably older device than Galaxy A25 5G, but it's a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but Motorola razr (2020) has the older 11 version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a very superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM. The Galaxy A25 5G features a sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a little larger screen and a quite higher display density.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB. Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a camera with a lower 48 megapixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture and a much bigger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.