Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A30's score of 79.6. Even though the Motorola razr (2020) is newer than Galaxy A30, it is heavier and just a bit thicker. Galaxy A30 counts with just a bit better display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little larger display, a just a bit better pixel count per screen inch and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 4 GB more RAM.
Motorola razr (2020) has a way better camera than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a back camera with way more mega pixels, a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos and videos and a way better (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy A30 counts with a much better battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.