Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is a little bit better than the Galaxy A31, getting an 87 score against 81.3. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola razr (2020) has newer 11 version and Galaxy A31 has Android 10 version. Even though Motorola razr (2020) and Galaxy A31 were released only 5 months apart, the Motorola razr (2020) body is just a little thinner but just a little heavier.
The Galaxy A31 features a little bit better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a just a bit better display pixel density, a quite bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Motorola razr (2020) has a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 4 GB more RAM. The Motorola razr (2020) shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a 0.5 inches sensor and a camera with a 48 mega pixels, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much higher (4K) video definition and a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 features a much better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 79 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.