Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, getting a overall score of 87 against 79.4. Motorola razr (2020) is an extremely older device than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, but Motorola was able to build it a bit lighter and a bit thinner. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Motorola razr (2020) has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much powerful CPU than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a bit more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit bigger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little better screen density.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a worse video quality and a tinier back camera sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light environments.
The Motorola razr (2020) features much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A35 5G has a much longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 79% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.