Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-02 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is a bit better than Galaxy A40, with a score of 87 against 79.6. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that. Motorola razr (2020) is a heavier cellphone than Galaxy A40, but both of them are 0.31inches thick.
Motorola razr (2020) has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A40 has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater amount of pixels in each screen inch and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340.
The Motorola razr (2020) features more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A40, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A40, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a camera with way more megapixels, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much larger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy A40 counts with just a little better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.