Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Prism Dot black, Prism Dot grey and Prism Dot white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A42's global score of 87. Both phones in our current comparison work with the same Android 11 operating system. Motorola razr (2020) is a just a little thinner and just a little lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A42, even when both were only released 1 months apart.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A42, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 4 GB more RAM. Motorola razr (2020) features a slightly better display than Galaxy A42, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 876 x 2142 pixels.
Motorola razr (2020) captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A42, and although they both have a 48 mega-pixels resolution camera, the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger camera aperture. The Samsung Galaxy A42 counts with more storage for games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A42 features a much longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.