Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is better than Galaxy A5 (2017), getting an 87 score against 75.8. Motorola razr (2020)'s construction has the same thickness than Galaxy A5 (2017), but it's heavier. The Galaxy A5 (2017) counts with a slightly better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a larger aperture for better images and videos in low light environments, a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a back facing camera with a way better resolution. Galaxy A5 (2017) has a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 7 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.