Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is slightly better than Galaxy A50's score of 83.8. The Motorola razr (2020) design is newer than the Galaxy A50's, although it is heavier and just a little thicker. Galaxy A50 features a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit greater pixel quantity per display inch, a little bigger display and a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) has just a bit better performance than Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola razr (2020) shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality photographs.
Galaxy A50 has just a bit bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a very superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A50. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola razr (2020), but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A50, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.