Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-02 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is just a bit better than the Galaxy A50s, having an 87 score against 86.6. Motorola razr (2020)'s body is newer, but just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than Galaxy A50s. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2020) has a newer 11 version and Galaxy A50s has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a little bit better display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a just a bit better display pixel density and a little bigger display. Motorola razr (2020) features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50s features a much longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy A50s's camera is just as good as the camera in Motorola razr (2020), and although the Galaxy A50s has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, they both have the same video frame rate, the same video quality, a back camera with a 48 MP and a same size sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.