Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is just a bit better than the Motorola razr (2020)'s 87 score. Even though the Galaxy A51 5G and Motorola razr (2020) were only released with a couple months difference, the Galaxy A51 5G construction is just a little bit thicker but a bit lighter than Motorola razr (2020). Both phones in our current comparison have the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
Galaxy A51 5G has a bit sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit larger screen, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the display. Motorola razr (2020) has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A51 5G has more storage for games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's camera is very similar to Motorola razr (2020)'s camera, and although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photography and videos, they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, a 48 MP back facing camera, the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is also a bargain compared to others, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.