Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is a bit better than the Motorola razr (2020), with a overall score of 90.7 against 87. Although the Galaxy A52 and the Motorola razr (2020) were released with only a couple of months difference, Galaxy A52's construction is just a little lighter but also a little bit thicker than the Motorola razr (2020).
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bigger screen, a bit better pixel density and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Galaxy A52 features a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.