Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is just a bit better than Motorola razr (2020)'s global score of 87. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and Motorola razr (2020) were only released 6 months apart, Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's construction is just a little bit lighter but just a little bit thicker. Both phones in this review use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11 version.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit higher pixels density, a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a really longer battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A52 5G takes a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.