Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than the Galaxy A6, having an 87 score against 75.8. Even though the Motorola razr (2020) is noticeably newer than the Galaxy A6, it's just a little thicker and heavier. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy A6, because it has a higher quantity of pixels per screen inch, a little bit larger display and a higher resolution of 876 x 2142px. Motorola razr (2020) takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy A6 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 7% larger battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), but if you don't you can save some money and get the Galaxy A6, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.