Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is better than Galaxy A7 (2017)'s score of 75.8. The Motorola razr (2020) design has the same thickness than Galaxy A7 (2017), but it's a little heavier. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) features a screen that's very similar to the screen in Motorola razr (2020), because although the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixel density and a slightly higher 1080 x 1920px resolution. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a very superior memory for apps and games than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) has greater battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3600mAh battery size against 2800mAh. The Motorola razr (2020) features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a way better video resolution, a larger camera aperture to capture better photos and video in low light situations and a much more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.