Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is a bit better than Motorola razr (2020)'s global score of 87. Even though the Galaxy A71 5G UW and the Motorola razr (2020) were only released 3 months apart, Galaxy A71 5G UW's construction is just a little bit lighter but a bit thicker. Both devices in this comparison come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A71 5G UW has an older 10 version and Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11.
Galaxy A71 5G UW's CPU is just as good as Motorola razr (2020)'s processing unit, both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a just a little higher count of pixels in each screen inch, a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a quite larger display.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photos and a way more MP camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has more memory for apps and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 61% more battery size.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.