Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is a bit better than Galaxy A9 (2018), with a score of 87 against 85.2. Motorola razr (2020) is a a bit heavier phone than Galaxy A9 (2018), but both of them have the same thickness. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a bit better display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels, a little bit bigger screen and a little greater pixels density.
Galaxy A9 (2018) has just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola razr (2020) has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory.
Motorola razr (2020) takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same (4K) video definition and the same aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a very superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3800mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.